MyRecon library

Choose an OSINT workflow by task and evidence

The useful comparison is the question a tool can answer, the evidence it returns and the work needed to verify that evidence. A tool directory or the largest site count cannot settle whether a workflow meets your task. Start with the detailed Sherlock comparison, then use the decision criteria below.

Username discovery: browser or local command line

MyRecon offers a browser username workflow with free guest previews, five signed-in standard scans per day and an optional paid pack. Its standard catalogue has 500+ platforms; Extended is a separate paid scope. Sherlock, Maigret and WhatsMyName have official project repositories and different interfaces or data models. Review each project's current documentation before installation. Prefer a local tool when scripted integration and local output control matter; prefer browser access when installation is impractical. Both require opening original sources and interpreting unavailable checks.

Breach exposure is a different question

Have I Been Pwned documents searches against its breach dataset. A breach entry can indicate exposure in that dataset; it does not prove that an account remains active, identify every service using an address or establish that a current password is compromised. A public username sweep cannot substitute for breach review. Choose the input and result type you need first, then follow the data source's response guidance.

Specialist tools and data providers

Graph tools, business-data APIs and search aggregators can have different inputs, data rights and subscription terms. Do not assume that they provide the same service as a username checker. Check what a returned relationship actually means and whether the data is suitable for your authorized purpose. This page does not claim to have tested commercial providers or compare their current subscription prices. Use their official documentation and terms before purchasing or sharing personal identifiers.

A reproducible comparison sheet

Use an account or identifier you control. Record the version, date, input, scan scope, expected positive and negative controls, returned URLs, unavailable checks, and manually verified outcomes. Separate setup effort from request duration. A successful HTTP response is not proof of a profile, and a random-looking username is not a verified negative control. Keep results that cannot be checked in the denominator as unavailable rather than silently excluding them.

Worked decision and published limits

Illustrative task: find and close your own old accounts from two remembered usernames. A browser sweep plus saved signup emails can be enough; a graph platform may add setup without resolving ownership. A task requiring repeatable local exports may favor a CLI. The homepage includes a recorded MyRecon username case with captured evidence, but its small scope is not a general accuracy score and is not a same-scope benchmark of every tool named here.

Official instructions and sources

Updated October 3, 2026. Worked examples are illustrative; external account flows were not tested on personal accounts.

MyRecon Android is in closed testing for eligible testers. App availability and details.